Products
Browse Lancing trigger cappers, cap feeding equipment, automatic screw cappers, compact capper platforms and semi-automatic capping machines.
Automatic trigger-sprayer capping system for cleaning, care and chemical bottles requiring stable cap presentation and repeatable closure control.
Vibratory bowl trigger-spray cap feeding and placement equipment for bottles with soft dip tubes and awkward trigger closure geometry.
High-speed inline belt/spindle screw capper for round plastic bottles, with guided side-belt transport and cap feeding options.
Pneumatic inline screw capping machine for spray, pump and screw-cap bottles with adjustable fixtures and repeatable torque control.
Space-saving screw capper for smaller production areas, laboratories and compact lines running sprays or standard screw caps.
Desktop semi-automatic screw capper with automatic bottle clamping, manual/automatic cycling and stable torque control for smaller batches.
How to choose
A trigger sprayer capper must be matched to the closure body, tube length, bottle shape and line flow. For screw and pump caps, the key points are torque, bottle clamping, cap feed and changeover time.
Buyer routes
These route pages help buyers compare the same machinery by closure type, automation level and application.
UK trigger cappers for spray bottles, pump closures and screw caps. Compare automatic trigger capping, cap feeding, dip-tube handling and Lancing support.
Trigger spray capper machinery for spray bottles, cleaning products and chemical bottles. Compare cap feeding, placement, torque and integration options.
Trigger sprayer capping machine options for closures with dip tubes. Compare placement, orientation, cap feeding and inline packaging integration.
Automatic trigger capper options for higher-output spray bottle lines. Compare cap feeding, orientation, placement, torque and conveyor integration.
Trigger cap feeder and spray cap orientation equipment for trigger sprayers with dip tubes. Plan bowl feeding, placement and capping integration.
Spray bottle capping machine options for trigger sprayers, pump closures and screw caps. Compare semi-automatic and automatic capping routes.
Verified comparison
The reference models cover different closure-handling problems. Use this table to decide which samples and production conditions need to be proved before a final quotation.
| Route | Reference data in this site | What must be confirmed |
|---|---|---|
| Automatic trigger sprayer capper | 1,200 BPH; trigger sprayer; customisable bottle format; VFD conveyor. | Closure supply, tube-entry method, orientation, pre-threading, torque, cap height, bottle stability and accepted output. |
| LU-XG446S trigger cap feeder | 20–25 BPM; approximate cap Ø15–35 mm; bottle height 10–280 mm. | Bulk separation, required orientation, tube protection, buffer length, transfer hand-off and jam recovery. |
| LU-XG440B belt spindle capper | 3,000–5,000 BPH; bottle Ø35–120 mm; bottle height 60–200 mm. | Whether the cap can be presented and pre-threaded before spindle tightening, plus side-belt support and cap-contact quality. |
| LU-XG16 automatic screw capper | 20–60 bottles/min; cap Ø18–70 mm; bottle Ø20–160 mm; height 30–300 mm. | Cap-placement route, guide/clamp setup, thread engagement, torque, air supply and line balance. |
| LU-XG1870 class compact capper | Approximately 20–40 bottles/min; cap Ø18–70 mm; bottle height approximately 60–270 mm. | Operator tasks, available footprint, manual or assisted cap presentation, changeover and accepted batch output. |
| LU-XG6100 semi-automatic capper | 20–60 bottles/min reference mechanical range; cap Ø20–60 mm, custom up to 90 mm; bottle height 100–300 mm. | Operator placement rate, ergonomics, bottle clamping, chuck suitability, first-off checks and sustained accepted output. |
All dimensions and rates above are source reference values. Final suitability depends on physical production samples and an agreed trial or acceptance method.
Choose the automatic trigger route when orientation, dip-tube insertion and repeatable placement need to be controlled as part of the machine rather than left to manual handling.
Choose the trigger feeder route when the main constraint is reliable orientation and presentation. The downstream capper and transfer interface must be specified at the same time.
Choose compact or semi-automatic equipment when an operator can place closures and flexibility matters more than continuous automatic feeding.
Route verification
Before comparing semi-automatic, feeder-assisted and automatic routes, define the sample set, accepted-pack quality, operator work, closure replenishment, line states and changeover scope.
Use a common FAT/SAT record so output and quality comparisons refer to the same bottle, trigger and operating duty.
Compare tube entry, thread engagement, cap height, torque method and cosmetic result rather than cycle rate alone.
Check how each route handles starvation, blockage, faults, reject confirmation and first-good-pack restart.